Poor oral health is associated with cardiovascular disease and dementia. Potential pathways include sepsis from oral bacteria, systemic inflammation, and nutritional deficiencies. However, in post-industrialized populations, links between oral health and chronic disease may be confounded because the lower socioeconomic exposome (poor diet, pollution, low physical activity) often entails insufficient dental care. We assessed tooth loss, caries, and damaged teeth, in relation to cardiovascular and brain aging among the Tsimane, a subsistence population living a relatively traditional forager-horticulturalist lifestyle with poor dental health, but minimal cardiovascular disease and dementia. Dental health was assessed by a physician in 739 participants aged 40-92 years with cardiac and brain health measured by chest computed tomography (CT) (n=728) and brain CT (n=605). A subset of 356 individuals aged 60+ were also assessed for dementia and mild cognitive impairment (n=33 impaired). Tooth loss was highly prevalent, with 2.2 teeth lost per decade and a 2-fold greater loss in women. The number of teeth with exposed pulp was associated with higher inflammation, as measured by cytokine levels and white blood cell counts, and lower body mass index. Coronary artery calcium and thoracic aortic calcium were not associated with tooth loss or damaged teeth. However, aortic valve calcification and brain tissue loss were higher in those that had more teeth with exposed pulp. Overall, these results suggest that dental health is associated with indicators of chronic diseases in the absence of typical confounds, even in a population with low cardiovascular and dementia risk factors.

Cross-sector collaborations are alliances among partners from various sectors, including health, education, and business, working together to address complex issues. These alliances are key to addressing inequities in maternal health outcomes. The seven chapters in this section outline examples of successful collaborations, provide information on barriers to, and facilitators of, successful collaboration, or describe opportunities to engage with traditional or nontraditional stakeholders invested in maternal health. Community engagement is also important in building cross-sector collaborations aimed at addressing inequities. The chapters of this section will give readers a better understanding of models for collaborations and community engagement that can be adapted and employed to address inequities in maternal health.

Introduction : This is the first study to use the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) theory for oral health (OH) interventions in pediatric practices. The objective of this qualitative study was to assess adoption and implementation of theory-based multi-level OH interventions, by clinicians (pediatricians and nurse practitioners) participating in a cluster-randomized clinical trial (cRCT), to create an OH toolkit for widespread dissemination into pediatric practices. Methods : Semi-structured interviews were conducted at the conclusion of the cRCT with 21 clinicians from 9 practices participating in the intervention arm. Clinicians in this arm received CSM theory-based education and resources to deliver OH interventions to parents/caregivers and document in EMR. Semi-structured interview questions were based on the Diffusion of Innovations Theory, assessing adoption and implementation. The interviews were coded using NVivo (QRS International) software. Main themes were identified using a thematic analysis approach. Results : Five themes identified from the interviews included: strengths of theory-based OH training for clinicians, OH resources to improve quality of care, considerations for efficient future implementation, financial considerations, and parent benefits and challenges. Clinicians found that the theory-based training and resources increased knowledge and confidence when addressing OH with parents and required only ≤ 2 minutes in their workflow with no financial consequences. Clinicians reported an increase in OH awareness among parents but suggested an overall need for more pediatric dentists. Conclusions : The CSM theory-based education and resources were well received by clinicians and perceived to be beneficial without adverse impact on workflow or practice finances. An online toolkit is planned, as these OH interventions can be successfully implemented and delivered in medical settings.

The Oral Health Nursing Education and Practice Program (OHNEP), a core partner of the National Interprofessional Initiative on Oral Health, is a national initiative focused on implementing an interprofessional oral health workforce innovation to influence change in clinical education, practice, and policy. OHNEP aims to address oral health disparities by enhancing the nursing profession's role in integrating oral health and its links to overall health in both academic and clinical settings. Leveraging the opportunity to cultivate faculty, preceptors, and clinicians as oral health champions, OHNEP aims to integrate interprofessional oral health clinical content and competencies in undergraduate and graduate nursing programs through faculty and preceptor development, curriculum integration, and establishing oral health as a standard of care in clinical settings. Outcomes include widespread dissemination of OHNEP virtual products and resources used by a significant number of undergraduate and graduate programs nationwide. OHNEP has a notable impact on policy related to integrating oral health and its links to overall health in undergraduate and graduate nursing programs, thereby increasing interprofessional oral health workforce capacity and aiming to improve oral health equity.

PURPOSE: Oral health (OH) has significant effects on pregnancy and infant outcomes. This study assesses the perspectives of obstetrical clinicians about OH education and promotion. METHODS: A fifteen-item survey was developed and circulated to obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) and family medicine (FM) physicians, and other prenatal health clinicians in Massachusetts (MA). Additionally, eight physicians were purposively sampled for in-depth interviews to discuss their experience with prenatal OH training and practice. Bivariate relationships between outcome variables from the survey (e.g., previous OH training, awareness of OH guidelines, asking about OH during prenatal visits) were analyzed along with coding and analysis of the qualitative interview data. RESULTS: The majority (77%) of the 86 survey respondents did not feel well-trained in OH. We found significant associations between being well-trained in OH and: (1) awareness of state guidelines (X(2) = 11.85, p < 0.001); (2) asking about OH during prenatal visits (X(2) = 9.21, p = 0.002); and (3) routinely referring patients for dental care (X(2) = 15.35, p < 0.001). Lack of access to dental insurance and dental professionals were found to be major perceived barriers to care. Responses from the interviews reinforced these findings.

Dental caries affect 97% of the world's population during their lifetime. Early childhood caries are the number one chronic disease affecting young children, and it disproportionately affects children of low-income families. American Academy of Pediatrics recommends fluoridated toothpaste to all children starting at tooth eruption, regardless of caries risk. In addition, fluoride varnish is recommended in all children every 3 to 6 months from tooth emergence until they have an established dental home. The health disparities that are most apparent in the rural communities are inadequate prenatal care, low birth weight, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, heart disease, unintentional injury, and stroke. When it comes to oral health, water fluoridation is one of the most cost-effective strategies in preventing dental caries. The need for oral health education in physician assistant/associate (PA) programs is well documented. Implementation has largely been performed using interprofessional education. This article describes an interprofessional education program that teaches PA students to apply fluoride varnish so that they are practice-ready when they graduate and practice medicine.

OBJECTIVES: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) may be well positioned to facilitate dental visits during pregnancy for low-income women. We sought to compare receipt of dental visits during pregnancy for women who received prenatal care at an FQHC versus a non-FQHC setting.

METHODS: We analyzed Michigan Medicaid administrative data for all live birth deliveries between April 2018 and December 2020. We used billing data to categorize the predominant setting for prenatal care as occurring at a FQHC or a non-FQHC and claims data to identify dental visits during pregnancy (in the 9 months prior to delivery). We employed bivariate and multivariate analyses to explore the relationship between setting for prenatal care and dental visits during pregnancy.

RESULTS: Women who received prenatal care at an FQHC versus non-FQHC had a higher proportion of dental visits during pregnancy (31.85% vs. 19.37%, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analyses, the strongest predictors of having a dental visit during pregnancy were FQHC prenatal care setting, having a dental emergency visit, having ≥3 prenatal visits, and having Medicaid coverage throughout pregnancy. Hispanic or Black race/ethnicity and 2020 delivery year were predictors of a lower likelihood of a dental visit. These predictors were consistent for the overall population and for the subset who had no dental visits pre-pregnancy.

CONCLUSION: Medicaid-enrolled women who receive prenatal care at an FQHC are more likely to have a dental visit during pregnancy than their counterparts who receive prenatal care in a non-FQHC setting.

Abstract

Tooth decay is the most common chronic disease in children, and children often see their primary care practitioners more frequently than dentists (Adjaye-Gbewonyo and Black 2019-2020; National Center for Health Statistics 2019-2020). This Infant Oral Health Education Program included two online training sessions for trainees in social work, nursing, medicine, and dentistry. Trainees were assessed on anticipated changes to their practice related to children's oral health. During the first training session, trainees received a lecture on infant oral health, and then discussed a case study in interprofessional groups to reinforce the content. Trainees in medicine and nursing completed training to receive Medicaid reimbursement for performing preventive oral health services. The second training session was profession specific with tailored instructions in the form of videos, as well as a demonstration on fluoride varnish application. Of the 78 trainees (22 social work, 4 pediatric nurse practitioner, 38 pediatric medicine residents, and 14 pediatric dentistry residents), 91% (n=70) reported that they were introduced to at least one new health information resource or tool. Four-fifths of the eligible trainees (n=16/20, 80%) who completed the evaluation had fulfilled the State's requirements to receive Medicaid reimbursement for performing preventive oral health services. Three-fourths of trainees (n=22/29, 75%) reported that they are likely to promote children's oral health in future clinical practice. Trainees from all four professions provided positive feedback about the content.